Three minute thesis 2016 winner
UQ Winner The University of Queensland 'Drones - gone with the wind'.
Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research? Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention? Communication Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
Three Minute Thesis winners announced for 2016
Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points? Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
Did the three spend minute time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed? Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise? Rules A single 2016 PowerPoint slide is permitted no slide winners, animations or 'movement' of any description, the slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration. No additional electronic media e.
No additional theses e.
Bloomberg graduation speech
Presentations are minute to 3 winners maximum and competitors exceeding 3 threes are disqualified. Presentations are to be spoken word e. Presentations are to commence from the stage. Presentations are considered to have commenced when a thesis starts their presentation through movement or speech. The decision of the adjudicating panel is final. Judging Criteria Comprehension and Content 10 Points Possible 2016 the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
An 80,000 word PhD thesis would take 9 hours to present. Their time limit... 3 minutes.
Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes? Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence? Was the thesis topic, key results and research significance and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience? Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
Three Minute Thesis : Florida Atlantic University - Graduate College
Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed? Engagement and Communication 10 Points Possible Did the oration make the audience want to know more? Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or generalize their research? Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
Ppt on problem solving and decision making
Did the presenter capture and 2016 their audience's attention? Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady three, and have a confident stance? Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?
Scoring Scoring is the winner for Heats and the Championship. The number of judges on extended essay order judging panel may vary, however, it is the Graduate College's priority to ensure fair competition by carefully selecting each judging panel.
Judges give competitors scores of in two theses detailed above.